Since Metro Bank opened its doors back in 2010, the UK banking market has seen an ongoing tide of new names being granted authorisation by the regulators.
This increase in the number of firms has seen many different approaches from those differentiating themselves from a technological perspective – app-only for example – or offering traditional banking services but oriented towards a specific demographic or industry niche.
However, all of this innovation and disruption is underpinned by imperatives common to all financial institutions, one of which is regulatory reporting.
The evolution of a challenger bank means that its regulatory requirements will change as it moves through its application process and beyond. During the mobilisation phase, modest requirements usually mean that only a light, tactical solution is required. However, when full authorisation is granted, business ramps up and full reporting requirements come into force and potentially increase. At this point, the need for a regulatory reporting platform capable of strategic growth to something that is fully automated, operationally robust and scalable becomes essential.
The majority of challenger banks are ‘technological greenfield sites’, meaning a lack of encumbrances that are associated with legacy platforms and the freedom to design an optimal software infrastructure for the organisation. However, the lack of existing software solutions can be a double-edged sword. Why? Because of the lack of data that would generally be used for the verification of new processes and the user acceptance testing of new software solutions - something that is particularly crucial when implementing a regulatory reporting platform. There’s a need for a clear and proven methodology to surmount these problems and dependable expertise to provide guidance during these processes of verification.
Decisions around the nature of deployment can also present challenges for a new firm. Not long ago, no financial institution would have contemplated trusting their regulatory data to a cloud platform, but this has changed significantly as providers have been able to demonstrate capabilities around issues such as security and performance. Challenger banks can certainly benefit from a partner who can support a range of on-premise and cloud deployment options, allowing for the discussion of the relative benefits of these approaches and ensuring that a firm’s preferred technology strategy is accomplished.
Perhaps the most onerous imposition on the inevitably stretched resources of a challenger bank is the necessity of keeping up with regulatory changes.
A solution that offers the automatic provision of updates and a vendor that provides guidance in this area will result in drastically reduced effort on behalf of the reporter, freeing up restricted bank resources whose expertise is more profitably spent in other areas. If an institution employs a strategic regulatory platform rather than a collection of point solutions, this will reduce the impact of regulatory change even more as it will allow reuse of data across regulators and returns.
The effort involved in setting up a challenger bank is, needless to say, considerable – I was shocked when I first saw an example of a licence application. I guess I was expecting the PRA equivalent of a gym membership form but was confronted by several crates full of documents. However, despite the obstacles to be overcome – only some of which are outlined above – we are starting to see the innovative thinking and hard work in this area start to bear fruit for a number of institutions and can expect to see many more organisations entering the market in the coming years.
SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTER TO RECEIVE MORE NEWS LIKE THIS STORY
84% would change financial services provider due to poor complaints experience
More than eight out of 10 customers (84%) claim that they would change financial services provider due to a poor complaints experience, according to the latest research...
City of London Group posts £3.6m pre-tax loss after absorbing banking licence costs
City of London Group PLC (COLG) has reported a pre-tax loss of £3.6m for the year ended 31st March 2019 after absorbing £1.7m of costs associated with applying for a UK banking licence and acquisition of Acorn to Oaks Financial Services Limited...
Redwood Bank appoints two new BDMs
Redwood Bank has appointed Dan Carter (pictured above, left) and Sue Young (right) as BDMs...
Sainsbury’s Bank updates residential and BTL mortgage ranges
Sainsbury’s Bank has updated its residential and BTL mortgage ranges...
Gatehouse Bank names new HR business partner
Gatehouse Bank has appointed Amy Lloyd (pictured above) as its new HR business partner...
Cynergy Bank aims to grow loan book up to £6bn by 2022
Cynergy Bank plans to grow its loan book to between £5bn-£6bn by 2022...
When uncertainty lends itself to opportunity
With £5.5bn of lending and rates pushed low, the second half of 2018 may have looked like an unusual time to launch a new lender into the bridging market...
Starling Bank partners with CreditLadder
Starling Bank has partnered with rent recognition platform CreditLadder to help its customers improve their credit score and get on the property ladder...
Paragon reduces rates on second charge mortgage range
Paragon has reduced the interest rates on its second charge mortgage products...
Hanley Economic BS launches RIO mortgage range in Scotland
Hanley Economic Building Society has launched its range of retirement interest only (RIO) mortgages in Scotland following feedback from its Scottish intermediary partners...
allpay.cards named as card provider for new mobile business banking service
Card manufacturer and bureau allpay.cards has revealed that it will provide the cards for the new Amaiz mobile business banking service...